Does anyone use film anymore photography

The only way to get parts is to cannibalize another camera. The film then has to be developed or processed. With the flooding of digital cameras, the film went away - well, almost. Prints were made from the film roll once it was processed. Once you got the photos, you decided if you wanted enlargements. From the time you took the pictures to the time you got the printed photos back, it could be as little as one hour with the 1-hour photo developing service or take a few days with regular service.

Remember, there was no immediate preview of the shot you just took! Think of something handmade versus machine-made. You know that the person that handmade it put thought and effort into it, there is a certain amount of craftsmanship for which you are willing to pay a premium price. Taking pictures with a film camera is similar.

For one, not everyone can do it well. It takes much practice and experience to produce stellar film images that only come with shooting rolls and rolls of films, using different films and cameras. Each film type has its personality - a unique look. If you give a monkey a DSLR and it takes 1, images in an hour, a handful is bound to be great images.

The learning curve with the film is much steeper. Unless one thoroughly understands the Exposure or Photography Triangle, one is unlikely to get far in film photography. While it is possible to buy fully automatic film cameras, folks who shoot with film do it for the pleasure, the reward of controlling all aspects of creating an image.

Folks realize a difference between applying a filter on an app to a digital image versus shooting the real thing - on film. It takes creativity at a higher level than using a filter. The film captures a dynamic range the difference between lighting and shadows that digital still struggles to render. In theory, the digital sensor is better at capturing the dynamic range than a film camera stops of light versus six stops on film. On digital, to get the same effect, one has to shoot multiple shots at varying exposures using exposure compensation or bracketing.

Then, in the digital darkroom Photoshop or Lightroom , you merge the images. This way, you have different exposures of the same scene that record the different light levels which are preserved upon the image being merged and give a look that is equivalent to film but, not quite. On film, if you learn how to set your exposure right, you can accomplish that dynamic range capture in one shot. The images are classy.

The film's look is unique in that it is imperfect - an aesthetic that is unmatched. Digital gives a clinical look to pictures. Crisp, sharp, vivid, and, yes, entirely predictable. There is a richness or warmth that you experience listening to a Vinyl record.

HDR had its time of glory. Only popular, cheap "analog" camera I can think of. Nothing like taking it to the next level. And just to make it clear no one cares if you go back to film. But great attitude anyway. There's a name for that. It's called trolling. If I did that on a forum topic, I'd be admonished if not outright banned. If you have to resort to such tactics to get attention, maybe what you have to say doesn't deserve attention.

I developed my first roll of time when I was 9, back in There's nothing I can do with film that I can't do better and easier with digital. Thank you for actually reading it. I have been making photos all my life, 32 years as a full time living. I started using digital in that work some 26 years ago and never quit shooting film. Now I have an unbelievable array of digital and film cameras and lenses that all integrate into either medium nicely. And that is a good thing because my darkroom based fine art silver print sales are up every year in the last 4.

Not all of us have and in my case, it has lead to a highly balanced creative diet, one that sees me having mastered both and the value each has as a creative gesture. I'll stick with digital, I already did the whole shoot on film and scan in stuff from about I now sometimes shoot with that and a Nikion F5 just for the fun of the time my brother and i spent together.

Still I mostly shoot digital even though in someways it is more fun for me to shoot film. Uh, nothing about digital requires you to put your images on line. Take the memory card, load them on to your PC, and you're done. I don't think that's what he meant. I think he is looking at a future that will not only geotag your images or connect to wifi, it will also auto back up to google drive or facebook albums, etc.

Not yet, but if cameras begin to act like mobile devices, you may not be able to function without being 'online', or connected to something. Exactly, try to buy a new car today, that doesnt track your movements and Traffic behaviour via the built in GPS and cameras.

Hoxton yes, cameras are likely going to be an IoT device with complete connectivity at some point. This decade will be all about IoT. The only importance of these discussions about film is to show how good digital photography is today. If photography had been born digital, film would never have been invented. And today Maybe more People are painting then ever before.

And new Technologies have been introduced like Acryl paint and brushes with synthetic hair. I think film photography changed after the digital Revolution like painting changed after the introduction of photography. Will I'd say it's more like the switch from using mineral pigments to synthetic. It wasn't that painting was dead, it's that what painters were currently doing was dead.

Portraits for example, photography could do it cheaper, faster and better. Painters had to respond. And they did. Is it worth the hefty price tag? We take a look at the Cine, the high-end model in this series. The Nikon Z9 is the company's first camera to feature a stacked CMOS sensor, which brings a raft of new features, including blazing speed and autofocus performance to the Z lineup.

Click through for our detailed first impressions of Nikon's latest professional ILC. The Sony a7 IV is the fourth generation of the company's core a7 full-frame mirrorless camera model, and it's the most advanced yet. Click through for an in-depth look at Sony's latest full-frame mirrorless ILC. Nik Silver Efex Pro 3, one of the standout components of Nik Collection 4, is a black-and-white conversion tool that goes far further than the grayscale or black-and-white tools built into all-in-one photo apps.

For some users, this app alone might be worth the cost of the whole collection — find out for yourself in our review. The Nikon Z mm F2. Get all the details in our full review. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.

If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites. We looked at cameras with selfie-friendly screens, wide-angle lenses, microphone inputs and great video quality, and selected the best. Recently the winners and runners up were announced for the Natural Landscape Photography Awards. The new version of the digital asset management tool promises improved performance and includes a new UI, new editing tools and improved workflow options.

Nikon doesn't specifically mention any future products, but does state the collaboration with Nissin and Profoto will 'increase reliable options for Nikon camera users, expanding possibilities for imaging expression'. Despite being a copy of a model from a far more popular manufacturer at its time of release, the Lomo LC-A has become an iconic camera in film photography culture and was the catalyst for the experimental 'Lomography' movement.

Zenfolio has announced the acquisition of Format, a popular website-building platform for photographers and other artists. The acquisition further bolsters Zenfolio's ongoing efforts to reinvigorate its business model and position itself a strong option for photographers looking to build a website and run a business. The 'Deakinizer' lens was made and popularized by cinematographer Roger Deakins when he used a modified Arri Macro lens to capture dreamy, tilt-shift like shots for the movie Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford.

NASA has published the first images from Landsat 9, a new space-based satellite designed to observe Earth in incredible detail. Geological Survey. But how much difference does the longer 40mm equivalent lens of the 'X' version make to the shooting experience? Click through to read more. Want to learn more about the Nikon Z9? Do you have a burning question you haven't seen answered anywhere else?

Join us for a live Twitter Space on Thursday, November 11, and be part of the conversation. Click through for details. The four firmware updates bring improved autofocus performance in a number of different shooting modes, as well as support for Nikon's new FTZ II mount adapter and Nikkor Z mm F4 S lens. Adrian Smith is back with another excellent slow-motion video of insects filmed with a high-speed Phantom camera. The original Tamron mm F2. Now Tamron is back with a second gen version that promises to be even better.

Does it deliver on that claim? Chris and Jordan did a side-by-side comparison to find out. Check out their gallery of sample photos to judge critical image quality for yourself. The lens will be a part of Panasonic's F1. Aptolux is a new company formed by videographers to create lighting solutions for videographers.

Its first product is the Aptolux MP-1, a modular, transforming LED light that can be as compact as a lunchbox when not being used yet deliver bright, efficient light. Sony's latest a7-series model is the most capable yet, but also the most expensive. We've been using Panasonic's new Lumix S 35mm F1. Panasonic has announced the Lumix S 35mm F1. Panasonic has released firmware version 1. The Hubble Space Telescope is in safe mode as engineers work to investigate what's wrong with the telescope's onboard instruments.

This is the second time the venerable telescope has faced extended downtime after being offline for a month earlier this year.

Panasonic China has posted a pair of images to various Chinese social media sites that tease what appears to be a new lens launch. Gordon Laing is back at it again with another Retro Review.

In this episode, Laing goes back 25 years to provide an in-depth overview of Nikon's unique Coolpix camera, which was half compact camera, half PDA.

The adapter includes optics to help offset the crop factor of APS-C cameras. OM Digital Solutions — the company that's bought the Olympus imaging division — has just launched the M.

Zuiko Digital ED 20mm F1. Click through for a closer look. Chris and Jordan tease-out the differences. After quickly selling out of its first batch back in , Lomography has announced that it's re-releasing its color-shifting LomoChrome Turquoise Film in 35mm, and format.

Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. Now reading: Opinion: Film photography has found its feet again comments. Photo: Hamish Gill Film photography is not what it used to be.

Film photography in is what it is — not because of a battle with digital, but because of how it has integrated with and into it Unfortunately, in our world of social media and websites and forums and blogs and YouTube and 'influencers', it feels a little bit like the views and opinions held by the majority can leave little room for the views and opinions held by everyone else.

The FIlmomat is an updated automatic film processor, launching soon! Photo: Lukas Fritz To begin with, the simple way people are using digital cameras and the advancements in both software and hardware for the digitization of film are examples of how the technology has advanced in favor or supporting film photography. The Cameradactyl OG is an affordable 3D-printed 4x5 camera. Tags: film , opinion.

View Comments Comments All Andre Nagel Don't get me wrong. Muskokaphotog Some of us may remember when you actually had to think when taking a photo. TomFord69 Do you think henri cartier bresson "had to think when taking a photo" before he took a photo or did he just shoot. Lightmomentum The first digital photo labs actually saved c41 film processing from extinction as coloured negatives printed on the digital system produced better overall quality prints than the original lens type enlargers.

Tactical Falcon Cool why not? Old Cameras I highly recommend this site for some actual photography and techniques and not just worthless talk and opinions. Picturenaut If you really love your Ricoh, send it to a specialist for repair. Smack53 Thanks for the input!

I think I'll give it a try! Muskokaphotog I understand your attempt an the analogy, but I think a better comparison would be digital "art" vs instrument and pigment to paper. Buelteman There is work that cannot be done digitally, like my camera- lens- and computer-free energetic photograms. But that might be ignorance on my part Oh and finally digital didn't win.

Brev00 I never felt I lost something moving from film to digital. How the Stables have turned. FujLiver I think you are missing the point. I get it. I get why some have a love of film, I'm just not one of them. Tungsten Nordstein mwhyte Are you suggesting that those who use film are romantics? Under The Sun I agree, fellow film shooter here since the 80s. Tungsten Nordstein I'll believe that film photography has found its feet again when new 35mm cameras become available to buy.

FujLiver whats the Nikon good news? Tungsten Nordstein gavinlg I didn't know about the Nikon F6. Picturenaut There still are many film SLRs in good condition available, with modern features. Tungsten Nordstein Olifaunt What they do need to make is new compact 35mm. Olifaunt Tungsten, I agree re.

Olifaunt jonby, maybe not GrahamHO One of the really good things about using film is that with good processing and storage your originals could still be around in 50 or years or more. RJGee Good point but where is there good processing?

Under The Sun I agree. FujLiver should this website be renamed from digital picture review? James Stirling The thing is a lot of old film cameras are close to indestructible :- With minimal maintenance they are good for decades of use.

Picturenaut James Stirling: "The thing is a lot of old film cameras are close to indestructible :- " I agree. Wil Helm I think it will Take a few years until new 35mm cameras are developed. Or a F4. Wil Helm F4 is way to heavy. Images by Duncan I learned with film and like it a lot better than digital.

Lars V I spent Saturday making palladium process contact prints from 8x10" negatives as well as digitally printed negs. Reactive The answer to quality control is not risking your entire shoot to find out days later that you shot a whole roll of duds.

Picturenaut Spot on, zakk9. Under The Sun Its psychological. It's not the camera its the photographer. Rob Which is more environmentally friendly? Carlos I would say both are just so bad for environment. Sardonic G Some of the negative comments about shooting film seem tinged with an unease, nay, fear of the medium. RJGee The trouble is, people want to "fix" things in the computer. Sardonic G Saying film doesn't "look better" than digital to me is the same as saying watercolor paintings aren't "better looking" than oil paintings.

I never thought I would type the word Rodinal again. JimP I loved spending hours in the darkroom personally. User Started with film around - showing my age. Make it mandatory reading for all new accounts and the rules section.

Artak Hambarian In this article by some reason are not mentioned the reasons why shoot film TwoMetreBill Film is for polluters. Artak Hambarian Film is for those who do not like to see sky banding of night photos. Because film has limited exposures, photographers are also forced to use every frame judiciously. Because you have to think about every shot beforehand, it activates your creativity.

Along with the creative possibilities — and constraints — that come with film, its low-fi, real-world aesthetic also appeals to photographers. On the Instagram account called I Still Shoot Film , nostalgia seeps through in high-contrast colors, grainy sunbeams and tinges of sepia. Judith Walgren, a Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer and professor of photojournalism and new media at Michigan State University, says she tries to impart this message to her students.

Walgren practices what she preaches: In addition to her digital tech, she also shoots with four film cameras. The photography site PetaPixel shot some identical wedding photos with both formats and did a side-by-side comparison to see if their team could tell the difference. The beauty of film is, for the most part, what you see is what you get. If you need proof that film is on the come-up, check out the FilmIsNotDead hashtag on Instagram, which has over 10 million mentions.

Most of them are stunning scans of images shot on film: everything from vivid schools of shimmying clownfish to powerful black-and-white portraits. Other tech, like the HP Sprocket 2nd Edition , captures the tangibility of a film print by letting you print out your digital frames and share them on the spot.

Even analog technology is getting a makeover. The Reflex camera , billed as the first update on a manual 35mm SLR camera system in over 25 years, oversold its production goal on Kickstarter last year.

It blends the classic appeal of an old-school film camera with new technology like an interchangeable lens mount and smartphone connectivity. And major players like Nikon and Leica still sell brand new millimeter cameras. With more photographers getting into film, film sales are seeing small, but not insignificant spikes.

The Harman Technology company reported a 5 percent year-on-year increase in sales in Fujifilm, the makers of the popular Instax instant camera, saw a big revenue spike in that it attributes not to its digital camera sales, but to sales of the film-based Instax camera. This year, Kodak also decided to bring back its Ektachrome film, a professional-grade slide film that was used for years in National Geographic before being discontinued in Just as corporations are benefiting from the film boom, Michigan State's Walgren says that for photographers, paper prints are also smart business.

Karen Thurman, owner of the U. She says that film prints pack an extra-special punch for her business, which is increasingly moving toward photographers who specialize in analog photographic processes. Learn how to meter by eye. Take it slow! Lean into the constraints of the medium. Consider developing your own prints. Get pro tips for shooting and framing your favorite photos.

You use what speaks to you at the time. Digital does not create film images. I have been photographing for many years. I have a Nikon F6 as well as a Nikon D I love the results from my film camera. I give the DSLR the same opportunities. I Sometimes shoot them side by side, film and digital. This is of course after processing both in photoshop. The DSLR images seem to have much less body to them, the film images seem to be more robust in nature.?? Hard to explain.

The DSLR is great for family stuff,weddings, birthdays etc. I keep trying but I always get the same results. The only file I could get my hands on was Kodachrome 25, or Kodachrome I took beautiful photos of archaeological sites such as Hatra, Nippur and Babylon.

My first camera was a Canon A1 purchased in I still have it. It still works. I will stick with film. Best wishes! I promise you…. I shoot digital now Nikon D with all Nikon lenses ranging from fisheye thru mm and macro prime Nikon mm. I post process in PS for many years and the digital bribgs beautiful images. I still hold on to my Nikon F90x tho. I can explain. I pick my shots carefully. I execute with care. I put the film in fridge and store them for the rest of the year there.

I develop them in dark room at Xmas time. I love the surprises , the forgotten moments, the throwback in time. The surprises, the mood of developing, the ritual of taking photos with a thought and preparation, not taking thousands of shots and scrapping them after.

The click with film counts, there is no other click and you only find out if you did it right or not in the red light. Simple argument, if your in business and have many clients shoot digital. If your doing it for personal work shoot film and enjoy the good ol days of analog! I am not happy coz I will never get the detail back! I shoot all digital.. I think that people should stop comparing resolution, the popular Joker Movie was filmed on 35mm and then mastered in 4k. Film gives you a more artistic look, and less worry about settings like white balance, auto focus, raw or jpeg.

Film looks good if you know what you are doing right out of the camera. I like not worrying about anything but composition, and not needing batteries, or having to edit photos.

Plus the cost of digital to get quality photos cost thousands or at the least hundreds of dollars if you are thrifty. For the year with the cameras and development, I will spend under , and can always go to medium format, or large format. Try buying a cheap digital medium format camera, is about 60mm so ten under IMAX standards. Digital may look technically correct, or sharper edge definition, or colour rendition.

But it is not as artistic, and post editing takes the art out of creation, editing numbers, and values, not air brushes, or toners, or even the film type. Film is coming back in a big way, I would say higher than Vinyl records. Timothy Leary. Film is more artistic? Resolution is highly dependant on grain of film stock used.

The recurring costs of film photography add up. Gear acquisition syndrome driving camera upgrades every 2 years only effects those who fall for it. The D produces excellent quality images. To be clear, my point re the d is it can be acquired for very little these days. Even better example would be a used D or D or even an old Canon 20D. I started my photogrphy journey with film and sold my SLR, lenses and tripods after a relatively short period of time.

It was pre-photoshop, scanning and digital manipulation. The cost of film, cost of processing and zero control over how film was processed just made the hobby inaccessible to me. Not to mention my little M10 weighs nothing compared to my OM10 which always felt like a brick around my neck and a pain to carry. Very good comparison of a digital and film photo showing what can be achieved straight from the camera.

I have owned full frame digital nikon and now an xt2 but have always missed what I got from film back in the day so have just gone back to an F5 mainly for black and white. Does anyone really believes that this comparison I legit the person clearly shoot with a flat picture profile and used a canon 6d which does not have the IQ that other Digital camera have like the d S on this comparison.

I am good, very, very good at computers technologies and been in digital for over 10 solid years now. Still so much of the world is in digital, how can we really avoid it. Converting film, much less prints, to digital so that I have a digital version of what I did, is slow and costly as its not common today.

With film I cannot go shoot and within minutes or less give somebody a jpg copy to check out. That ease of use has value. The digital is not as good, but the effect of getting a draft into 20 peoples hands editors, etc 20 minutes after shooting it gets a some respect, not to mention high demand. Their values are a dichotomy to me, that neither can be brushed away or solved by the other.

No offense but what you describe is not digital vs film but a completely different matter. This is an endless debate, and one which will, by definition, divide us into different camps.

Pretty low I would guess. Happy shooting to you all. For me, 35mm film connects me to my past. Also, I wanted my young daughter to have a physical photo album. Shooting with a film camera is also very satisfying. I love to hear the clockwork mechanism on slow speeds. Also, yes the images just simply look nicer. I have been suggesting to Google that they include a mechanical shutter sound for their phone camera. Hey Jeffrey this is Stormie. Glad to see you are back. Very fun article to watch.

The sword was my favorite. Hope you keep them coming. Happy New Year. Only in the hands of those with the patience, skill and dedication, will a film camera likely yield superior results to a digital one. I was 10 when I got my first camera for Christmas in It was an Ansco Panda. I took a hiatus from film beginning in and am just getting back to it.

A few years ago I jumped in fully with serious digital equipment. What really amazed me when I purchased and started using Vintage TLRs and folding 6x6s was how much photography — and me — had changed.

It took me awhile to remember to set the speed and aperture, focus, cock the shutter, shoot and advance the film. In all cases now my end product is digital — either direct from the camera or from scanned film.

This gives me the chance to enhance, crop, manipulate any image. I love it. Keep in mind that film photography is more expensive, but the photos often look better. See if […]. Great article. Not a professional by any means, but nothing beats film. That is, when in the hands of the right developer. I can use a digital to scout areas I want to shoot, and record comments. With a digital I can shoot, record comments about when I think will be the right time for that special composition.

For the most part, digital is the more common method of taking pictures, but there are benefits to […]. Whichever gives you the happiest experience. When it comes to commercial shooting the client needs will determine what platforms you are able to bring to the table, but when doing it for your own reward — try out all kinds and see what suits you.

I shoot both. I only use film when I want a slow day, ie. Heck trying to focus on them running around is enough to drive one to some bad habits. Point is, both has there place. Film photographers have to learn aperture, shutter speed etc. I want to see what my eye through the lens saw, not a manipulated Light room version of. She knew the beauty and soul of film.

For me, this was a request I could keep.